Mastering Prompt Engineering: Structure, Context, and Intent
Prompt engineering is no longer “asking politely.” It’s designing cognition — shaping how language models think, parse, and act. This article unpacks the structural, contextual, and philosophical layers of prompt craft.
1) The Three Axes of Prompt Design
- Structure: order, hierarchy, delimiters.
- Context: injected data, examples, role definitions.
- Intent: the real goal behind the words.
2) System → Instruction → Input Hierarchy
SYSTEM: You are a scientific writing assistant.
USER: Summarize this article in one paragraph.
Each layer narrows ambiguity. A good system prompt defines style and boundaries; the instruction sets task granularity.
3) Context Packing
- Use tables, JSON, or schemas — not prose — for structured data.
- Anchor facts before tasks (“Context first, command second”).
- Trim redundant adjectives; every token counts.
4) Few-Shot and Chain-of-Thought
Q: Translate "hello" to French
A: bonjour
Q: Translate "good night" to French
A: bonne nuit
Pattern repetition builds latent grammar in the model’s hidden states.
5) Anti-Patterns
- Vague adjectives (“creative”, “unique”) without examples.
- Nested or conflicting instructions.
- Excessive boilerplate or apologies — they dilute focus.
6) Prompt Chains for Agents
Break reasoning into atomic steps:
- Rephrase the task.
- Plan (list required sub-actions).
- Execute step-by-step.
- Summarize or verify output.
7) Evaluation Metrics
- Precision: fewer hallucinations.
- Consistency: same input → same output.
- Latency vs depth: response time vs token usage.
“Prompts are UX for the invisible.” — redesign.ir
Tip: Keep a versioned prompt library in your repo. Treat prompts like code — lint, diff, and benchmark them.
Comments
Join the discussion. We keep comments private to your device until moderation tooling ships.